Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 and addition of bogus Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal held that Assessing Officer failed to apply independent mind while issuing reopening notice, merely relying on information from Director of Income Tax (Investigation) without forming requisite "reason to believe" that income escaped assessment. Regarding LTCG on penny stocks, ITAT found AO's reliance on SEBI report baseless as the report on JMD Telefilms did not implicate assessee, who held shares for over three years and sold during price decline period. SEBI never issued notice to assessee or broker regarding these transactions. Without specific evidence controverting documentary proof and absent any SEBI inquiry involving assessee, legitimate stock exchange transactions qualified for exemption under Section 10(38). Assessment additions deleted entirely.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147 and addition of bogus Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal held that Assessing Officer failed to apply independent mind while issuing reopening notice, merely relying on information from Director of Income Tax (Investigation) without forming requisite "reason to believe" that income escaped assessment. Regarding LTCG on penny stocks, ITAT found AO's reliance on SEBI report baseless as the report on JMD Telefilms did not implicate assessee, who held shares for over three years and sold during price decline period. SEBI never issued notice to assessee or broker regarding these transactions. Without specific evidence controverting documentary proof and absent any SEBI inquiry involving assessee, legitimate stock exchange transactions qualified for exemption under Section 10(38). Assessment additions deleted entirely.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.