Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT rejected assessee's books of accounts due to suppressed purchases, sales, and unaccounted payments. The tribunal directed application of 5% net profit rate on aggregate turnover comprising both recorded sales and unrecorded sales discovered in impounded documents SP-68, SP-73, and SP-42. The Assessing Officer was instructed to calculate difference between estimated profit and declared profit, adding such difference to returned income. No separate additions were permitted for other expenditure heads, low household expenses, or undisclosed investments in daughters' names, as these were deemed covered by enhanced income estimation. The appeal was decided partly in favor of the assessee with consequential relief granted.
ITAT rejected assessee's books of accounts due to suppressed purchases, sales, and unaccounted payments. The tribunal directed application of 5% net profit rate on aggregate turnover comprising both recorded sales and unrecorded sales discovered in impounded documents SP-68, SP-73, and SP-42. The Assessing Officer was instructed to calculate difference between estimated profit and declared profit, adding such difference to returned income. No separate additions were permitted for other expenditure heads, low household expenses, or undisclosed investments in daughters' names, as these were deemed covered by enhanced income estimation. The appeal was decided partly in favor of the assessee with consequential relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.