Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed the seizure memo for 17,085 kg betel nuts and truck under Customs Act sections 7, 11, 46, and 47, following precedent established in M/s Ashoke Das. The court held that proper officers must record reasons to believe goods are liable to confiscation prior to seizure, with such reasons indicated in the seizure memo beyond mere panchnama. While the seizure memo was quashed for procedural deficiency in failing to record requisite reasons to believe, the HC clarified that quashing does not preclude the Department from conducting fresh investigation and proceeding lawfully under Customs Act provisions. The writ application was disposed of with Department retaining authority to reinitiate proceedings in accordance with proper legal procedures and statutory requirements.
The HC quashed the seizure memo for 17,085 kg betel nuts and truck under Customs Act sections 7, 11, 46, and 47, following precedent established in M/s Ashoke Das. The court held that proper officers must record reasons to believe goods are liable to confiscation prior to seizure, with such reasons indicated in the seizure memo beyond mere panchnama. While the seizure memo was quashed for procedural deficiency in failing to record requisite reasons to believe, the HC clarified that quashing does not preclude the Department from conducting fresh investigation and proceeding lawfully under Customs Act provisions. The writ application was disposed of with Department retaining authority to reinitiate proceedings in accordance with proper legal procedures and statutory requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
