Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a money laundering case involving forged Form 15CBs and remittances exceeding Rs. 300 crores. Though not named in the predicate FIR, the Enforcement Directorate attributed proceeds to the applicant's company under PMLA Sections 3 and 70. The Court held that statutory presumption under Section 24 PMLA arose, which the applicant failed to rebut. The applicant's evasive conduct, including non-compliance with multiple Section 50 summons despite being intercepted at Amritsar airport, demonstrated lack of bona fides. As a Hong Kong permanent resident with no fixed Indian assets, the applicant posed flight risk. The Court emphasized custodial interrogation necessity in white-collar crimes and found premature bail would impede investigation and compromise PMLA objectives.
The HC dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a money laundering case involving forged Form 15CBs and remittances exceeding Rs. 300 crores. Though not named in the predicate FIR, the Enforcement Directorate attributed proceeds to the applicant's company under PMLA Sections 3 and 70. The Court held that statutory presumption under Section 24 PMLA arose, which the applicant failed to rebut. The applicant's evasive conduct, including non-compliance with multiple Section 50 summons despite being intercepted at Amritsar airport, demonstrated lack of bona fides. As a Hong Kong permanent resident with no fixed Indian assets, the applicant posed flight risk. The Court emphasized custodial interrogation necessity in white-collar crimes and found premature bail would impede investigation and compromise PMLA objectives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
