Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a money laundering case involving forged Form 15CBs and remittances exceeding Rs. 300 crores. Though not named in the predicate FIR, the Enforcement Directorate attributed proceeds to the applicant's company under PMLA Sections 3 and 70. The Court held that statutory presumption under Section 24 PMLA arose, which the applicant failed to rebut. The applicant's evasive conduct, including non-compliance with multiple Section 50 summons despite being intercepted at Amritsar airport, demonstrated lack of bona fides. As a Hong Kong permanent resident with no fixed Indian assets, the applicant posed flight risk. The Court emphasized custodial interrogation necessity in white-collar crimes and found premature bail would impede investigation and compromise PMLA objectives.
The HC dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS in a money laundering case involving forged Form 15CBs and remittances exceeding Rs. 300 crores. Though not named in the predicate FIR, the Enforcement Directorate attributed proceeds to the applicant's company under PMLA Sections 3 and 70. The Court held that statutory presumption under Section 24 PMLA arose, which the applicant failed to rebut. The applicant's evasive conduct, including non-compliance with multiple Section 50 summons despite being intercepted at Amritsar airport, demonstrated lack of bona fides. As a Hong Kong permanent resident with no fixed Indian assets, the applicant posed flight risk. The Court emphasized custodial interrogation necessity in white-collar crimes and found premature bail would impede investigation and compromise PMLA objectives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
