Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging provisional attachment orders under PMLA. The appellants contended properties acquired prior to PMLA enforcement and scheduled offence commission could not be attached, arguing lack of connection with proceeds of crime and non-compliance with Section 5(1) conditions. The AT held that properties acquired as "value thereof" need not prove direct connection with proceeds of crime when direct proceeds are absent. Settlement deeds executed post-fraud discovery were deemed attempts to frustrate PMLA proceedings, justifying immediate attachment under the second proviso of Section 5(1). The appellant failed to establish legal income sources for property acquisition despite claiming transfer via settlement deed. The AT ruled ED need not conduct independent investigation of predicate offences, only identify glaring mistakes in police investigations while maintaining consistency with predicate offence conclusions.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging provisional attachment orders under PMLA. The appellants contended properties acquired prior to PMLA enforcement and scheduled offence commission could not be attached, arguing lack of connection with proceeds of crime and non-compliance with Section 5(1) conditions. The AT held that properties acquired as "value thereof" need not prove direct connection with proceeds of crime when direct proceeds are absent. Settlement deeds executed post-fraud discovery were deemed attempts to frustrate PMLA proceedings, justifying immediate attachment under the second proviso of Section 5(1). The appellant failed to establish legal income sources for property acquisition despite claiming transfer via settlement deed. The AT ruled ED need not conduct independent investigation of predicate offences, only identify glaring mistakes in police investigations while maintaining consistency with predicate offence conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
