Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT upheld service tax liability on appellant as recipient of manpower recruitment and supply services from overseas entity, following Supreme Court precedent in Northern Operating Systems case. The tribunal determined that foreign company provided taxable services under Finance Act sections 65(105)K (pre-2012) and 65B(44) (post-2012), making appellant liable under reverse charge mechanism per section 66A. However, CESTAT rejected extended limitation period, finding no willful suppression or deliberate misstatement by appellant. Penalties were set aside while demands were confined to normal limitation period with applicable interest. The tribunal dismissed appellant's revenue neutrality argument and distinguished factual differences from Northern Operating Systems precedent, concluding the overseas arrangement constituted manpower supply services requiring service tax payment by Indian recipient entity.
CESTAT upheld service tax liability on appellant as recipient of manpower recruitment and supply services from overseas entity, following Supreme Court precedent in Northern Operating Systems case. The tribunal determined that foreign company provided taxable services under Finance Act sections 65(105)K (pre-2012) and 65B(44) (post-2012), making appellant liable under reverse charge mechanism per section 66A. However, CESTAT rejected extended limitation period, finding no willful suppression or deliberate misstatement by appellant. Penalties were set aside while demands were confined to normal limitation period with applicable interest. The tribunal dismissed appellant's revenue neutrality argument and distinguished factual differences from Northern Operating Systems precedent, concluding the overseas arrangement constituted manpower supply services requiring service tax payment by Indian recipient entity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.