Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC granted bail to petitioner charged under Sections 132(l)(a), (e), (f) and (I) read with Section 132(l)(i), 132(iv)(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion through sale of tyres and tubes below market value. Court considered petitioner's two-and-half months judicial custody since April 2025, filing of charge-sheet in May 2025, age-related health issues, and precedents including Vineet Jain. Court noted evidence would be primarily documentary and electronic with official witnesses, eliminating tampering concerns, and anticipated lengthy trial proceedings. Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to trial court satisfaction and imposed conditions under Section 483 BNSS.
HC granted bail to petitioner charged under Sections 132(l)(a), (e), (f) and (I) read with Section 132(l)(i), 132(iv)(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion through sale of tyres and tubes below market value. Court considered petitioner's two-and-half months judicial custody since April 2025, filing of charge-sheet in May 2025, age-related health issues, and precedents including Vineet Jain. Court noted evidence would be primarily documentary and electronic with official witnesses, eliminating tampering concerns, and anticipated lengthy trial proceedings. Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 5,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to trial court satisfaction and imposed conditions under Section 483 BNSS.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
