Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC dismissed the petition challenging show cause notice and consequent order along with notifications 9/2023-Central Tax, 56/2023-Central Tax, and 56/2023-State Tax. Petitioner alleged impugned order was passed hastily without considering their reply and documents, violating natural justice principles. Court examined submissions and impugned order, finding it was passed after due consideration of petitioner's reply. HC determined the order did not warrant judicial interference and directed petitioner to pursue remedy before appellate authority. Court granted extension until 15th July 2025 for filing appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Petition disposed of with direction to exhaust statutory appellate remedy.
HC dismissed the petition challenging show cause notice and consequent order along with notifications 9/2023-Central Tax, 56/2023-Central Tax, and 56/2023-State Tax. Petitioner alleged impugned order was passed hastily without considering their reply and documents, violating natural justice principles. Court examined submissions and impugned order, finding it was passed after due consideration of petitioner's reply. HC determined the order did not warrant judicial interference and directed petitioner to pursue remedy before appellate authority. Court granted extension until 15th July 2025 for filing appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Petition disposed of with direction to exhaust statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
