Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition challenging show cause notice and consequent order along with notifications 9/2023-Central Tax, 56/2023-Central Tax, and 56/2023-State Tax. Petitioner alleged impugned order was passed hastily without considering their reply and documents, violating natural justice principles. Court examined submissions and impugned order, finding it was passed after due consideration of petitioner's reply. HC determined the order did not warrant judicial interference and directed petitioner to pursue remedy before appellate authority. Court granted extension until 15th July 2025 for filing appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Petition disposed of with direction to exhaust statutory appellate remedy.
HC dismissed the petition challenging show cause notice and consequent order along with notifications 9/2023-Central Tax, 56/2023-Central Tax, and 56/2023-State Tax. Petitioner alleged impugned order was passed hastily without considering their reply and documents, violating natural justice principles. Court examined submissions and impugned order, finding it was passed after due consideration of petitioner's reply. HC determined the order did not warrant judicial interference and directed petitioner to pursue remedy before appellate authority. Court granted extension until 15th July 2025 for filing appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. Petition disposed of with direction to exhaust statutory appellate remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
