Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal against penalty under section 43 of Black Money Act for non-disclosure of foreign assets in income tax return. The assessee failed to declare Barclays Bank PLC Isle of Man investment in prescribed column, but her husband had properly disclosed the foreign bank accounts and interest income in his returns. The assessee subsequently filed updated return for AY 2022-23 disclosing foreign assets under FA Schedule. ITAT found the lapse inadvertent and non-malicious, noting bona fide compliance through husband's disclosures and assessee's cooperation during penalty proceedings including submission of bank statements and supporting documents. Following coordinate bench precedents, ITAT held that technical breaches arising from bona fide belief, where primary holder disclosed assets, do not warrant penal consequences. Revenue failed to prove assessee was beneficial owner or had willful intent to evade tax, making penalty unjustified and unsustainable.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal against penalty under section 43 of Black Money Act for non-disclosure of foreign assets in income tax return. The assessee failed to declare Barclays Bank PLC Isle of Man investment in prescribed column, but her husband had properly disclosed the foreign bank accounts and interest income in his returns. The assessee subsequently filed updated return for AY 2022-23 disclosing foreign assets under FA Schedule. ITAT found the lapse inadvertent and non-malicious, noting bona fide compliance through husband's disclosures and assessee's cooperation during penalty proceedings including submission of bank statements and supporting documents. Following coordinate bench precedents, ITAT held that technical breaches arising from bona fide belief, where primary holder disclosed assets, do not warrant penal consequences. Revenue failed to prove assessee was beneficial owner or had willful intent to evade tax, making penalty unjustified and unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.