Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance under section 69C regarding "Downside on Sale of Flats" expenses totaling INR 17.60 crores. The assessee entered underwriting agreements with developer BDMC for specified flats, assuming all risks and rewards from MOU execution. When BDMC sold 20 flats to end customers at prices lower than assessee's contractual payment obligations to BDMC, genuine business losses resulted. ITAT distinguished this arrangement from actual property sales, finding consistent treatment across assessment years where similar arrangements generated taxable income. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention regarding inadequate documentation, noting comprehensive evidence including MOUs, bank statements, and ledger accounts establishing transaction genuineness. ITAT also dismissed section 68 addition concerning unsecured loans, finding AO's rejection based solely on IDBI Bank's non-response to notices under section 133(6) insufficient given adequate documentary evidence provided by assessee.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance under section 69C regarding "Downside on Sale of Flats" expenses totaling INR 17.60 crores. The assessee entered underwriting agreements with developer BDMC for specified flats, assuming all risks and rewards from MOU execution. When BDMC sold 20 flats to end customers at prices lower than assessee's contractual payment obligations to BDMC, genuine business losses resulted. ITAT distinguished this arrangement from actual property sales, finding consistent treatment across assessment years where similar arrangements generated taxable income. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention regarding inadequate documentation, noting comprehensive evidence including MOUs, bank statements, and ledger accounts establishing transaction genuineness. ITAT also dismissed section 68 addition concerning unsecured loans, finding AO's rejection based solely on IDBI Bank's non-response to notices under section 133(6) insufficient given adequate documentary evidence provided by assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
