Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the revenue's appeal in a VAT classification dispute regarding equipment rental services. The assessee hired computers, printers, servers and peripherals to clients under agreements granting legal right to use the goods at specified locations. The court held that despite location restrictions, clients possessed effective control and legal right to use equipment, constituting supply of tangible goods subject to VAT as deemed sale. However, the court ruled against invoking extended limitation period, finding no willful suppression of facts since the assessee maintained service tax registration, filed returns promptly, and paid service tax liability, making the department aware of transaction nature. Consequently, penalty and interest were deemed inapplicable, upholding the tribunal's decision favoring the assessee.
The HC dismissed the revenue's appeal in a VAT classification dispute regarding equipment rental services. The assessee hired computers, printers, servers and peripherals to clients under agreements granting legal right to use the goods at specified locations. The court held that despite location restrictions, clients possessed effective control and legal right to use equipment, constituting supply of tangible goods subject to VAT as deemed sale. However, the court ruled against invoking extended limitation period, finding no willful suppression of facts since the assessee maintained service tax registration, filed returns promptly, and paid service tax liability, making the department aware of transaction nature. Consequently, penalty and interest were deemed inapplicable, upholding the tribunal's decision favoring the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.