Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
HC dismissed contempt proceedings against respondents 5 and 6 after accepting their uncontroverted explanations in show cause responses, as petitioner filed no rejoinder. Court found illegal recovery by State respondents and directed refund with 9% per annum simple interest from recovery date until refund date, payable within six weeks. State respondents ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 costs to petitioner within same timeframe due to illegal recovery causing litigation. Writ application disposed of with directions for monetary relief and interest compensation to petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
