Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the confiscation order and imposition of fine and penalty against the petitioner, finding the action arbitrary and violative of Section 130(4) of the CGST Act, 2017. The court determined that principles of natural justice were breached as no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner before imposing the penalties. The matter was remitted to the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun with directions to restart proceedings from the show-cause notice stage, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and natural justice principles. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, allowing the petitioner a fresh opportunity to present their case before the competent authority.
The HC set aside the confiscation order and imposition of fine and penalty against the petitioner, finding the action arbitrary and violative of Section 130(4) of the CGST Act, 2017. The court determined that principles of natural justice were breached as no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner before imposing the penalties. The matter was remitted to the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Dehradun with directions to restart proceedings from the show-cause notice stage, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements and natural justice principles. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, allowing the petitioner a fresh opportunity to present their case before the competent authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.