TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding disallowance of loss on Amritsar real estate project. Lower authorities erroneously determined the loss crystallized in AY 2010-11, but ITAT found disputes between parties continued until compromise deed dated 20-7-2012, making AY 2012-13 the correct year for crystallization. The Tribunal noted documentary evidence in Supplementary Paper Book demonstrated ongoing disputes post-2009. ITAT concluded the loss properly crystallized on 20-7-2012 when disputes were finally resolved through compromise deed. The Tribunal emphasized tax rates remained consistent across relevant assessment years, citing precedent that revenue suffers no prejudice when tax rates are uniform, making the timing dispute academic. The assessee's explanation for claiming deduction in AY 2012-13 was accepted as convincing.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding disallowance of loss on Amritsar real estate project. Lower authorities erroneously determined the loss crystallized in AY 2010-11, but ITAT found disputes between parties continued until compromise deed dated 20-7-2012, making AY 2012-13 the correct year for crystallization. The Tribunal noted documentary evidence in Supplementary Paper Book demonstrated ongoing disputes post-2009. ITAT concluded the loss properly crystallized on 20-7-2012 when disputes were finally resolved through compromise deed. The Tribunal emphasized tax rates remained consistent across relevant assessment years, citing precedent that revenue suffers no prejudice when tax rates are uniform, making the timing dispute academic. The assessee's explanation for claiming deduction in AY 2012-13 was accepted as convincing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
