Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT set aside ex-parte order passed by CIT(Appeals)/NFAC against assessee for non-compliance with hearing notices regarding undisclosed cash payments. Tribunal granted final opportunity to assessee, considering benefit of doubt and circumstances beyond assessee's control preventing representation. Matter remanded to CIT(Appeals)/NFAC for de novo adjudication following precedent established in similar case. ITAT noted assessee's involvement in substantial unaccounted investments and money rotation through related entities, directing revenue authorities to conduct detailed investigation to determine whether transactions constitute legitimate tax planning or tax evasion. Tribunal emphasized that if fraud is established, it vitiates everything including natural justice principles, requiring assessee to approach court with clean hands. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with mandate for thorough examination of potential sham transactions.
ITAT set aside ex-parte order passed by CIT(Appeals)/NFAC against assessee for non-compliance with hearing notices regarding undisclosed cash payments. Tribunal granted final opportunity to assessee, considering benefit of doubt and circumstances beyond assessee's control preventing representation. Matter remanded to CIT(Appeals)/NFAC for de novo adjudication following precedent established in similar case. ITAT noted assessee's involvement in substantial unaccounted investments and money rotation through related entities, directing revenue authorities to conduct detailed investigation to determine whether transactions constitute legitimate tax planning or tax evasion. Tribunal emphasized that if fraud is established, it vitiates everything including natural justice principles, requiring assessee to approach court with clean hands. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes with mandate for thorough examination of potential sham transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.