Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the entire addition made by AO under section 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period. The assessee successfully explained the source of cash deposits totaling Rs. 43,49,428/- by demonstrating that cash balance was maintained in regular books of account accepted by AO, and deposits originated from legitimate cash withdrawals from bank accounts and available cash in hand. CIT(A) had erred by providing only 50% relief without detailed factual analysis. ITAT found the source of cash deposits adequately explained through regular banking transactions and book entries, concluding no addition was warranted as the deposits were from explained sources rather than unexplained cash.
ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the entire addition made by AO under section 115BBE for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization period. The assessee successfully explained the source of cash deposits totaling Rs. 43,49,428/- by demonstrating that cash balance was maintained in regular books of account accepted by AO, and deposits originated from legitimate cash withdrawals from bank accounts and available cash in hand. CIT(A) had erred by providing only 50% relief without detailed factual analysis. ITAT found the source of cash deposits adequately explained through regular banking transactions and book entries, concluding no addition was warranted as the deposits were from explained sources rather than unexplained cash.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
