Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee-trust's appeal regarding revision under section 263 and exemption eligibility under section 11. The CIT had directed the AO to conduct inquiries into interest transactions and verify activities against trust objects. ITAT held that micro-financing activities to poor rural women constitute charitable activities under the first limb of section 2(15), qualifying for section 11 exemption. The decision relied on the principle of consistency, noting that ITAT Cochin Bench previously held identical micro-financing activities as charitable for AY 2011-2012, confirmed by Kerala HC. Despite res judicata not applying to income tax proceedings, consistency principle applies when identical facts permeate across assessment years. The trust's rural micro-financing qualified as relief to the poor rather than general public utility activities.
ITAT allowed the assessee-trust's appeal regarding revision under section 263 and exemption eligibility under section 11. The CIT had directed the AO to conduct inquiries into interest transactions and verify activities against trust objects. ITAT held that micro-financing activities to poor rural women constitute charitable activities under the first limb of section 2(15), qualifying for section 11 exemption. The decision relied on the principle of consistency, noting that ITAT Cochin Bench previously held identical micro-financing activities as charitable for AY 2011-2012, confirmed by Kerala HC. Despite res judicata not applying to income tax proceedings, consistency principle applies when identical facts permeate across assessment years. The trust's rural micro-financing qualified as relief to the poor rather than general public utility activities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.