Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to respondent No.5 for fresh reconsideration following subsequent developments where proceedings against the petitioner were dropped for tax period 2020-21. The court found the impugned notifications dated 28.12.2023 and 29.12.2023 required examination regarding their validity under Section 168A read with Section 73 of CGST/KGST Act, 2017, and applicability of Circular No. 219/13/2024-GST. The petition was allowed by way of remand, directing respondent No.5 to reconsider the matter afresh within stipulated timeframe in accordance with law, bearing in mind the Form GST DRC-05 order dated 28.02.2025.
The HC set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter to respondent No.5 for fresh reconsideration following subsequent developments where proceedings against the petitioner were dropped for tax period 2020-21. The court found the impugned notifications dated 28.12.2023 and 29.12.2023 required examination regarding their validity under Section 168A read with Section 73 of CGST/KGST Act, 2017, and applicability of Circular No. 219/13/2024-GST. The petition was allowed by way of remand, directing respondent No.5 to reconsider the matter afresh within stipulated timeframe in accordance with law, bearing in mind the Form GST DRC-05 order dated 28.02.2025.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.