Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petition challenging show-cause notice alleging receipt of smuggled foreign gold and suppression of facts. Court found SCN was issued after considering petitioner's preliminary submissions and provided adequate opportunity for hearing before adjudication. HC held that alleged suppression of facts rendered petitioner's argument about deciding case on admitted facts untenable, as suppression makes admitted facts unreliable and may surface new material requiring reconsideration. Court noted petitioner had adequate statutory remedies available under Sections 128 and 129 of Customs Act through appellate authorities competent to address technical grounds. HC concluded no grounds existed for writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when alternative statutory remedies remained available.
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petition challenging show-cause notice alleging receipt of smuggled foreign gold and suppression of facts. Court found SCN was issued after considering petitioner's preliminary submissions and provided adequate opportunity for hearing before adjudication. HC held that alleged suppression of facts rendered petitioner's argument about deciding case on admitted facts untenable, as suppression makes admitted facts unreliable and may surface new material requiring reconsideration. Court noted petitioner had adequate statutory remedies available under Sections 128 and 129 of Customs Act through appellate authorities competent to address technical grounds. HC concluded no grounds existed for writ jurisdiction under Article 226 when alternative statutory remedies remained available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
