Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed appellant's appeal, quashing the Single Judge's order denying customs exemption under Notification No.153/93/Cus for Software Technology Park imports. Despite Revenue's contention that "prior permission" from Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was mandatory, HC applied doctrine of substantial compliance, finding appellant had substantially met notification requirements. Court distinguished between procedural versus substantive conditions, noting inter-departmental delays cannot deny legitimate exemption benefits. Appellant had timely applied for permissions, imported telematic equipment within prescribed monetary limits, and utilized goods for 100% export-oriented software development as intended by notification. HC emphasized legislative intent to promote foreign exchange earnings through exports should not be frustrated by technical objections when substantive compliance achieved.
HC allowed appellant's appeal, quashing the Single Judge's order denying customs exemption under Notification No.153/93/Cus for Software Technology Park imports. Despite Revenue's contention that "prior permission" from Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was mandatory, HC applied doctrine of substantial compliance, finding appellant had substantially met notification requirements. Court distinguished between procedural versus substantive conditions, noting inter-departmental delays cannot deny legitimate exemption benefits. Appellant had timely applied for permissions, imported telematic equipment within prescribed monetary limits, and utilized goods for 100% export-oriented software development as intended by notification. HC emphasized legislative intent to promote foreign exchange earnings through exports should not be frustrated by technical objections when substantive compliance achieved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.