Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
DSC granted bail to accused charged with GST fraud involving creation of multiple fake firms and fictitious transactions to claim illegal input tax credit. Despite prosecution's allegations of complex fraud scheme, court found accused posed no flight risk as no summons were issued after protection withdrawal. Accused remained in custody for 57 days while complaint filing deadline approached. Court noted investigation relied primarily on documentary evidence with witness statements already recorded, indicating investigation completion. Citing precedent that continued custody served no purpose once complaint filed, DSC admitted accused to bail on furnishing Rs. 2,00,000 bond with family member surety and imposed conditions. Bail application allowed despite prosecution's flight risk concerns.
DSC granted bail to accused charged with GST fraud involving creation of multiple fake firms and fictitious transactions to claim illegal input tax credit. Despite prosecution's allegations of complex fraud scheme, court found accused posed no flight risk as no summons were issued after protection withdrawal. Accused remained in custody for 57 days while complaint filing deadline approached. Court noted investigation relied primarily on documentary evidence with witness statements already recorded, indicating investigation completion. Citing precedent that continued custody served no purpose once complaint filed, DSC admitted accused to bail on furnishing Rs. 2,00,000 bond with family member surety and imposed conditions. Bail application allowed despite prosecution's flight risk concerns.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
