Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
DSC dismissed the anticipatory bail application in a GST evasion case involving allegations of fraud and willful suppression of facts. Despite interim protection granted to the accused and SC stay on show cause notice proceedings, the court found the accused failed to demonstrate bona fides by not voluntarily approaching the investigating agency after multiple summons and non-bailable warrants were issued. The court noted the accused allegedly instructed employees to withhold information and manage witness statements, constituting impermissible conduct. The accused's failure to cooperate with the investigation and attempts to influence witnesses prevented meeting the requisite threshold for anticipatory bail relief under established legal standards.
DSC dismissed the anticipatory bail application in a GST evasion case involving allegations of fraud and willful suppression of facts. Despite interim protection granted to the accused and SC stay on show cause notice proceedings, the court found the accused failed to demonstrate bona fides by not voluntarily approaching the investigating agency after multiple summons and non-bailable warrants were issued. The court noted the accused allegedly instructed employees to withhold information and manage witness statements, constituting impermissible conduct. The accused's failure to cooperate with the investigation and attempts to influence witnesses prevented meeting the requisite threshold for anticipatory bail relief under established legal standards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.