Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding 'on-money' addition, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s restriction to 25% of AO's addition, finding AO lacked evidentiary basis for extrapolation from 99acres.com reference prices. On transfer pricing adjustments for debenture interest and expenses, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s deletion, noting TPO failed to apply prescribed methods under section 92C(1) read with Rule 10AB for determining arm's length price. Court held CCD issuance was quasi-capital nature and cited Shell India Markets precedent that share issuance to non-resident associated enterprises doesn't attract transfer pricing provisions. For various business expenses disallowance, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)'s allowance, finding expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes without capital or personal nature.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding 'on-money' addition, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s restriction to 25% of AO's addition, finding AO lacked evidentiary basis for extrapolation from 99acres.com reference prices. On transfer pricing adjustments for debenture interest and expenses, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s deletion, noting TPO failed to apply prescribed methods under section 92C(1) read with Rule 10AB for determining arm's length price. Court held CCD issuance was quasi-capital nature and cited Shell India Markets precedent that share issuance to non-resident associated enterprises doesn't attract transfer pricing provisions. For various business expenses disallowance, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)'s allowance, finding expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes without capital or personal nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.