Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding 'on-money' addition, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s restriction to 25% of AO's addition, finding AO lacked evidentiary basis for extrapolation from 99acres.com reference prices. On transfer pricing adjustments for debenture interest and expenses, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s deletion, noting TPO failed to apply prescribed methods under section 92C(1) read with Rule 10AB for determining arm's length price. Court held CCD issuance was quasi-capital nature and cited Shell India Markets precedent that share issuance to non-resident associated enterprises doesn't attract transfer pricing provisions. For various business expenses disallowance, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)'s allowance, finding expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes without capital or personal nature.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding 'on-money' addition, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s restriction to 25% of AO's addition, finding AO lacked evidentiary basis for extrapolation from 99acres.com reference prices. On transfer pricing adjustments for debenture interest and expenses, ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s deletion, noting TPO failed to apply prescribed methods under section 92C(1) read with Rule 10AB for determining arm's length price. Court held CCD issuance was quasi-capital nature and cited Shell India Markets precedent that share issuance to non-resident associated enterprises doesn't attract transfer pricing provisions. For various business expenses disallowance, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)'s allowance, finding expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes without capital or personal nature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.