Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under money laundering proceedings involving large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds. The tribunal rejected appellant's contention that no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days, holding that attachment proceedings protect property until investigation conclusion and trial completion. The tribunal found sufficient evidence linking appellant to money laundering offenses, noting appellant's admission regarding fund sources from the consultancy company operating the educational institute. The tribunal emphasized that properties can be attached from any person possessing proceeds of crime, regardless of whether they are accused in the predicate offense. The tribunal concluded sufficient incriminating material existed against appellants for receiving proceeds of crime, dismissing all grounds of appeal.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under money laundering proceedings involving large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds. The tribunal rejected appellant's contention that no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days, holding that attachment proceedings protect property until investigation conclusion and trial completion. The tribunal found sufficient evidence linking appellant to money laundering offenses, noting appellant's admission regarding fund sources from the consultancy company operating the educational institute. The tribunal emphasized that properties can be attached from any person possessing proceeds of crime, regardless of whether they are accused in the predicate offense. The tribunal concluded sufficient incriminating material existed against appellants for receiving proceeds of crime, dismissing all grounds of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.