Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC rejected applicant's reference application under Chhattisgarh Value Added Sales Tax Act, 2005. Applicant failed to produce mandatory Form 3 for eight years to discharge burden of proof regarding sub-contractor's tax payment on turnover. Court held that reference jurisdiction is purely advisory and consultative, requiring substantial question of law under Section 55(2). Payment of tax by sub-contractor remained disputed question of fact, not law, as Form 3 was not produced within statutory timeframe. No statutory duty exists compelling Department to grant indefinite extensions for Form 3 submission. Absence of Form 3 negated double taxation concerns. Court distinguished between questions of fact versus law, concluding no legal question arose warranting HC's adjudication in reference proceedings.
HC rejected applicant's reference application under Chhattisgarh Value Added Sales Tax Act, 2005. Applicant failed to produce mandatory Form 3 for eight years to discharge burden of proof regarding sub-contractor's tax payment on turnover. Court held that reference jurisdiction is purely advisory and consultative, requiring substantial question of law under Section 55(2). Payment of tax by sub-contractor remained disputed question of fact, not law, as Form 3 was not produced within statutory timeframe. No statutory duty exists compelling Department to grant indefinite extensions for Form 3 submission. Absence of Form 3 negated double taxation concerns. Court distinguished between questions of fact versus law, concluding no legal question arose warranting HC's adjudication in reference proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
