Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding deduction of employees' superannuation fund contributions under section 36(1)(va). The assessee made payments after the scheme's prescribed due date but before the return filing due date under section 139(1). The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s finding that contributions deposited before section 139(1) due date qualify for deduction, provided the superannuation fund maintains approved status. CIT(A) properly directed the assessing officer to verify the fund's approval status and allow the claim accordingly. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order and deemed the directions fair and reasonable. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding deduction of employees' superannuation fund contributions under section 36(1)(va). The assessee made payments after the scheme's prescribed due date but before the return filing due date under section 139(1). The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s finding that contributions deposited before section 139(1) due date qualify for deduction, provided the superannuation fund maintains approved status. CIT(A) properly directed the assessing officer to verify the fund's approval status and allow the claim accordingly. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s order and deemed the directions fair and reasonable. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
