Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding TDS credit denial. The AO erroneously granted proportionate TDS credit despite the assessee offering total income for the assessment year. The turnover discrepancy between Form 26AS and books was explained through sales returns. When considering sales returns, the declared turnover matched Form 26AS turnover with TDS credit under section 194O. CIT(A) rejected the assessee's explanation based on assumptions that sales returns required replacement goods or gross refunds including TDS. ITAT held that e-platform operators deducted TDS at sale time while returning net amounts to buyers post-TDS deduction. CIT(A)'s rejection was based on presumptions rather than factual analysis, warranting reversal of the lower authorities' decisions.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding TDS credit denial. The AO erroneously granted proportionate TDS credit despite the assessee offering total income for the assessment year. The turnover discrepancy between Form 26AS and books was explained through sales returns. When considering sales returns, the declared turnover matched Form 26AS turnover with TDS credit under section 194O. CIT(A) rejected the assessee's explanation based on assumptions that sales returns required replacement goods or gross refunds including TDS. ITAT held that e-platform operators deducted TDS at sale time while returning net amounts to buyers post-TDS deduction. CIT(A)'s rejection was based on presumptions rather than factual analysis, warranting reversal of the lower authorities' decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.