Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Board disposed of proceedings against the Noticee regarding liability for company's unauthorized issuance of Redeemable Preference Shares to public without compliance with Companies Act, 1956 and SEBI Act, 1992. The Board held that liability under Section 73(2) requires establishing the person as an "officer who is in default" per Section 5 of Companies Act, 1956, which includes managing directors, whole-time directors, managers, secretaries, or persons charged with statutory compliance responsibilities. Since the Final Order failed to identify any specific officer in default and record showed another individual as Managing Director during relevant period 2011-12, with no evidence of Noticee's involvement in RPS issuance or designation as responsible officer, the Board concluded Noticee could not be held liable for alleged contraventions and disposed of proceedings.
The Board disposed of proceedings against the Noticee regarding liability for company's unauthorized issuance of Redeemable Preference Shares to public without compliance with Companies Act, 1956 and SEBI Act, 1992. The Board held that liability under Section 73(2) requires establishing the person as an "officer who is in default" per Section 5 of Companies Act, 1956, which includes managing directors, whole-time directors, managers, secretaries, or persons charged with statutory compliance responsibilities. Since the Final Order failed to identify any specific officer in default and record showed another individual as Managing Director during relevant period 2011-12, with no evidence of Noticee's involvement in RPS issuance or designation as responsible officer, the Board concluded Noticee could not be held liable for alleged contraventions and disposed of proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
