Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging directions requiring a former director to file an affidavit confirming accuracy of ledger transactions for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19. The liquidator alleged fraudulent transactions totaling Rs. 27,07,470 based on forensic audit findings showing underreported balances and missing cash. The appellant denied allegations claiming unsubstantiated charges and flawed audit methodology. NCLAT held the impugned order was purely procedural and fact-finding in nature, aimed at establishing truthfulness of ledger entries through affidavit filing. Since the order's implications were yet to be considered on merits by the adjudicating authority, NCLAT declined to exercise appellate jurisdiction under Section 61 of IBC 2016, affirming the tribunal's directions.
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging directions requiring a former director to file an affidavit confirming accuracy of ledger transactions for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19. The liquidator alleged fraudulent transactions totaling Rs. 27,07,470 based on forensic audit findings showing underreported balances and missing cash. The appellant denied allegations claiming unsubstantiated charges and flawed audit methodology. NCLAT held the impugned order was purely procedural and fact-finding in nature, aimed at establishing truthfulness of ledger entries through affidavit filing. Since the order's implications were yet to be considered on merits by the adjudicating authority, NCLAT declined to exercise appellate jurisdiction under Section 61 of IBC 2016, affirming the tribunal's directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
