Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed bail applications filed by petitioners charged under PMLA 2002. The court rejected the claim for statutory bail, finding that minor defects in the investigation did not entitle petitioners to default bail, particularly since investigation was completed before complaint filing. Regarding regular bail under Section 45 of PMLA, the court held that petitioners failed to satisfy the twin conditions. While acknowledging that statements recorded under Section 50 post-arrest may face admissibility challenges per Vijay Madanlal Choudhary precedent, the court noted additional material evidence existed beyond these statements. The prosecution presented sufficient grounds indicating petitioners' potential guilt and likelihood of reoffending. The court concluded no reasonable grounds existed to believe petitioners were innocent or unlikely to commit offences while on bail, warranting dismissal of all applications.
The HC dismissed bail applications filed by petitioners charged under PMLA 2002. The court rejected the claim for statutory bail, finding that minor defects in the investigation did not entitle petitioners to default bail, particularly since investigation was completed before complaint filing. Regarding regular bail under Section 45 of PMLA, the court held that petitioners failed to satisfy the twin conditions. While acknowledging that statements recorded under Section 50 post-arrest may face admissibility challenges per Vijay Madanlal Choudhary precedent, the court noted additional material evidence existed beyond these statements. The prosecution presented sufficient grounds indicating petitioners' potential guilt and likelihood of reoffending. The court concluded no reasonable grounds existed to believe petitioners were innocent or unlikely to commit offences while on bail, warranting dismissal of all applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.