Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal concerning service tax demands on three residential construction projects. For Project Prakruti Nivas, comprising 612 individual villas completed with completion certificate dated 30.03.2009, the Tribunal held no service tax liability existed as construction concluded before 01.07.2010 when Construction of Residential Complex service became taxable. Similarly, Project Sri Vajralayam received regularisation certificate from Deputy Commissioner under Andhra Pradesh Government Order dated 31.12.2007, which CESTAT treated as equivalent to completion certificate under Board Circular 151/2/2012, establishing completion before the taxable period. However, Project Srinivasa Krupa was remanded for redetermination of service tax liability applying 25% taxable value under Rule 2A of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 as amended by Finance Act 2017, requiring recalculation of the demand rather than total consideration value.
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal concerning service tax demands on three residential construction projects. For Project Prakruti Nivas, comprising 612 individual villas completed with completion certificate dated 30.03.2009, the Tribunal held no service tax liability existed as construction concluded before 01.07.2010 when Construction of Residential Complex service became taxable. Similarly, Project Sri Vajralayam received regularisation certificate from Deputy Commissioner under Andhra Pradesh Government Order dated 31.12.2007, which CESTAT treated as equivalent to completion certificate under Board Circular 151/2/2012, establishing completion before the taxable period. However, Project Srinivasa Krupa was remanded for redetermination of service tax liability applying 25% taxable value under Rule 2A of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 as amended by Finance Act 2017, requiring recalculation of the demand rather than total consideration value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
