Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Section 138B compliance and proof of knowledge are essential before penalty for dealing with confiscable goods can stand.
    SEZ supply duty levy fails where statutory scheme excludes customs duty, with consequential interest and penalties also set aside.
    Refund of EDD in SVB matters cannot await finalisation of unrelated assessment issues; delayed refund attracts statutory interest.
    Confiscation and IPR infringement in customs: non-infringing goods released, counterfeit goods absolutely confiscated, penalty reduced.
    Mixed iron ore consignments must be classified as a whole, while declared export values govern final self-assessment.
    Customs Broker due diligence upheld where valid GST registration existed on export date, restoring the licence.
    Finality of rehabilitation orders bars reopened tax exemption claims where the State expressly refused consent to the concession clause.
    Cash collateral adjustment does not erase default; Section 7 insolvency application restored for fresh consideration.
    Recall of merits order rejected where party participated; limitation under IBC not saved by belated recall or writ proceedings.
    FDI as equity is not borrowing in rupees; downstream investment and trust-based penalties failed on the notice and facts.
    Reverse charge on foreign remittances fails where payments relate to goods imports, overseas services, reimbursements, and revenue-neutral entries.
    Delayed payment charges in stock broking and DEMAT services: negative list relief for brokerage, tax upheld for DEMAT defaults.
    Scientific and technical consultancy tax fails where inter-governmental technology transfer does not involve a qualifying technical provider.
    Import policy for specified silver bars tightened: classification moved from free import to restricted status under revised conditions.
    Custodianship renewal for a container freight station extended for five years, subject to compliance with cargo handling regulations.
    Sample collection and dispatch rules tightened for faster laboratory testing of import consignments at JNCH.
    Prolonged incarceration justified regular bail where trial was slow and substantial prosecution evidence remained incomplete.
    Writ jurisdiction cannot quash pending criminal prosecution where disputed facts must be tried in a criminal court.
    Section 129 release of detained goods on penalty payment despite ownership dispute and pending demand adjudication.
    Invalid service by affixation and premature tax recovery were held illegal, with refund ordered.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The HC dismissed petitioners' challenge to investigation...

Investigation proceedings for fake input tax credit cannot be quashed despite alleged procedural deficiencies in GST cases

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST June 27, 2025 Case Laws HC
The HC dismissed petitioners' challenge to investigation proceedings concerning large-scale tax evasion through fraudulent input tax credit under HPGST/CGST Act. The court held that Cr.P.C provisions apply to GST Act proceedings absent contrary provisions, citing Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India. Petitioners' contention that investigation was improper because officials failed to contact Delhi GST authorities was rejected. The court found that discovering non-existent entities at invoice addresses sufficiently established prima facie case of fake invoices. Following Mukesh Singh precedent, the court ruled investigation validity is not vitiated merely because departmental officials conducted it. The HC emphasized that while exercising inherent power, courts examine prima facie cases without evaluating evidence creditworthiness, which remains trial court's domain. Consequently, the complaint could not be quashed based on alleged investigative deficiencies.

Topics

Acts Income Tax