Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC allowed the petition challenging rejection of GST refund claim for unutilized input tax credit. Petitioner sought refund but authorities rejected the claim for non-submission of Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate as mandated by CBIC Circular. Petitioner submitted Chartered Accountant certificate evidencing receipt of convertible foreign exchange for exported services, citing technical inability to access Form GST RFD-08 on portal. HC relied on Supreme Court precedent in Union of India v Mangal Textile Mills holding CA certificates constitute authentic documents requiring consideration by authorities. Court directed respondent-authorities to process refund application without insisting on FIRC requirement, accepting CA certificate as sufficient proof of foreign exchange realization. Impugned order quashed and set aside.
HC allowed the petition challenging rejection of GST refund claim for unutilized input tax credit. Petitioner sought refund but authorities rejected the claim for non-submission of Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate as mandated by CBIC Circular. Petitioner submitted Chartered Accountant certificate evidencing receipt of convertible foreign exchange for exported services, citing technical inability to access Form GST RFD-08 on portal. HC relied on Supreme Court precedent in Union of India v Mangal Textile Mills holding CA certificates constitute authentic documents requiring consideration by authorities. Court directed respondent-authorities to process refund application without insisting on FIRC requirement, accepting CA certificate as sufficient proof of foreign exchange realization. Impugned order quashed and set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
