Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The assessee claimed LTCG exemption under section 10(38) on penny stock transactions. PCIT invoked Explanation 2(a) to section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest due to AO's failure to conduct adequate inquiry despite receiving investigation report identifying the company as penny stock operator. Tribunal upheld PCIT's direction for fresh assessment with proper verification. HC rejected assessee's contentions regarding availability of two views and breach of natural justice, holding concurrent findings justified as AO failed to make necessary inquiries regarding penny stock transactions before allowing LTCG exemption.
HC dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging PCIT's revision order under section 263. The assessee claimed LTCG exemption under section 10(38) on penny stock transactions. PCIT invoked Explanation 2(a) to section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest due to AO's failure to conduct adequate inquiry despite receiving investigation report identifying the company as penny stock operator. Tribunal upheld PCIT's direction for fresh assessment with proper verification. HC rejected assessee's contentions regarding availability of two views and breach of natural justice, holding concurrent findings justified as AO failed to make necessary inquiries regarding penny stock transactions before allowing LTCG exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
