Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s allowance of exemption under Section 10(23C)(via) to assessee-trust. Revenue initially denied exemption due to non-filing of Form 10BB, but CIT(A) permitted the claim as Form 10BB was subsequently filed within timeframe prescribed by CBDT Circular No.16/2024 dated 18.11.2024. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, noting revenue failed to identify specific errors in the order. Assessee possessed provisional approval under Section 10(23C)(via) for assessment years 2022-2023 and 2024-2025 through order dated 30.09.2021, and requisite Form 10BB was properly filed. Revenue's appeal dismissed for lack of demonstrable error in lower authority's reasoning.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal challenging CIT(A)'s allowance of exemption under Section 10(23C)(via) to assessee-trust. Revenue initially denied exemption due to non-filing of Form 10BB, but CIT(A) permitted the claim as Form 10BB was subsequently filed within timeframe prescribed by CBDT Circular No.16/2024 dated 18.11.2024. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, noting revenue failed to identify specific errors in the order. Assessee possessed provisional approval under Section 10(23C)(via) for assessment years 2022-2023 and 2024-2025 through order dated 30.09.2021, and requisite Form 10BB was properly filed. Revenue's appeal dismissed for lack of demonstrable error in lower authority's reasoning.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.