Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld reassessment notice under section 148 issued within six-year limitation period for AY 2015-16, finding escaped income of Rs. 45,00,000 exceeded statutory threshold. Tribunal rejected challenges regarding mechanical approval by PCIT under section 151 and improper service, noting electronic service compliance and assessee's participation in faceless assessment proceedings. However, ITAT denied section 54 exemption for property comprising four ground-floor shops and one first-floor room, ruling the predominantly commercial character disqualified it as "residential house" despite assessee's claims. Tribunal directed AO to recompute capital gains on 50% share only, recognizing joint ownership with spouse as evidenced in sale deed. Appeal partly allowed regarding computation adjustment while upholding reassessment validity and exemption denial.
ITAT upheld reassessment notice under section 148 issued within six-year limitation period for AY 2015-16, finding escaped income of Rs. 45,00,000 exceeded statutory threshold. Tribunal rejected challenges regarding mechanical approval by PCIT under section 151 and improper service, noting electronic service compliance and assessee's participation in faceless assessment proceedings. However, ITAT denied section 54 exemption for property comprising four ground-floor shops and one first-floor room, ruling the predominantly commercial character disqualified it as "residential house" despite assessee's claims. Tribunal directed AO to recompute capital gains on 50% share only, recognizing joint ownership with spouse as evidenced in sale deed. Appeal partly allowed regarding computation adjustment while upholding reassessment validity and exemption denial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
