Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal regarding disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) for interest-free advances to sister concern. Assessee company provided interest-free loan to sister concern while claiming interest deduction on secured loans from banks and financial institutions. CIT(A) deleted additions after examining remand report, finding no evidence that advances were made for non-business purposes. CIT(A) noted investee company regularly paid advance tax with effective tax rate exceeding assessee's rate. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, concluding the issue was examined correctly and additions were rightly deleted, establishing commercial expediency justified the interest-free advances despite simultaneous borrowing costs.
ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal regarding disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) for interest-free advances to sister concern. Assessee company provided interest-free loan to sister concern while claiming interest deduction on secured loans from banks and financial institutions. CIT(A) deleted additions after examining remand report, finding no evidence that advances were made for non-business purposes. CIT(A) noted investee company regularly paid advance tax with effective tax rate exceeding assessee's rate. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, concluding the issue was examined correctly and additions were rightly deleted, establishing commercial expediency justified the interest-free advances despite simultaneous borrowing costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
