Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed demand notices for arrear rent, cess, and conversion fees pertaining to pre-implementation periods of Resolution Plan under IBC 2016. Petitioner company underwent CIRP from August 2018, with Resolution Plan approved by NCLT in July 2022 and implemented December 2022. Respondent authorities' claims were never submitted during CIRP nor included in approved Resolution Plan. Court held Section 31(1) IBC ensures finality in resolution process, creating binding effect on all stakeholders including statutory authorities. All pre-implementation claims not part of approved Resolution Plan stood extinguished in law, enabling "clean slate" takeover. Statutory dues do not survive beyond CIRP contrary to respondents' contentions. Demand notices violated Section 31 IBC and lacked legal sanctity.
HC quashed demand notices for arrear rent, cess, and conversion fees pertaining to pre-implementation periods of Resolution Plan under IBC 2016. Petitioner company underwent CIRP from August 2018, with Resolution Plan approved by NCLT in July 2022 and implemented December 2022. Respondent authorities' claims were never submitted during CIRP nor included in approved Resolution Plan. Court held Section 31(1) IBC ensures finality in resolution process, creating binding effect on all stakeholders including statutory authorities. All pre-implementation claims not part of approved Resolution Plan stood extinguished in law, enabling "clean slate" takeover. Statutory dues do not survive beyond CIRP contrary to respondents' contentions. Demand notices violated Section 31 IBC and lacked legal sanctity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
