Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT allowed appeal challenging dismissal of contempt petition for want of prosecution. Appellants sought permanent injunction restraining respondent from transferring 400 shares and mandatory injunction relief. Tribunal originally dismissed contempt petition due to non-compliance with registry objections and lack of prosecution. NCLAT held that contempt proceedings under Section 425 of Companies Act 2013 follow Contempt of Courts Act 1971 provisions. Court emphasized contempt proceedings maintain tribunal's prestige rather than enforce personal rights, thus should be decided on merits even without applicant's presence. Despite 374-day delay, NCLAT condoned delay citing appellants' medical ailments as reasonable cause. Tribunal erred in dismissing petition for want of prosecution when defects remained unrectified and proceedings had not properly commenced. Order dated 30.08.2019 rejecting contempt petition recalled and appeal allowed.
NCLAT allowed appeal challenging dismissal of contempt petition for want of prosecution. Appellants sought permanent injunction restraining respondent from transferring 400 shares and mandatory injunction relief. Tribunal originally dismissed contempt petition due to non-compliance with registry objections and lack of prosecution. NCLAT held that contempt proceedings under Section 425 of Companies Act 2013 follow Contempt of Courts Act 1971 provisions. Court emphasized contempt proceedings maintain tribunal's prestige rather than enforce personal rights, thus should be decided on merits even without applicant's presence. Despite 374-day delay, NCLAT condoned delay citing appellants' medical ailments as reasonable cause. Tribunal erred in dismissing petition for want of prosecution when defects remained unrectified and proceedings had not properly commenced. Order dated 30.08.2019 rejecting contempt petition recalled and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.