Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT allowed appeal challenging dismissal of contempt petition for want of prosecution. Appellants sought permanent injunction restraining respondent from transferring 400 shares and mandatory injunction relief. Tribunal originally dismissed contempt petition due to non-compliance with registry objections and lack of prosecution. NCLAT held that contempt proceedings under Section 425 of Companies Act 2013 follow Contempt of Courts Act 1971 provisions. Court emphasized contempt proceedings maintain tribunal's prestige rather than enforce personal rights, thus should be decided on merits even without applicant's presence. Despite 374-day delay, NCLAT condoned delay citing appellants' medical ailments as reasonable cause. Tribunal erred in dismissing petition for want of prosecution when defects remained unrectified and proceedings had not properly commenced. Order dated 30.08.2019 rejecting contempt petition recalled and appeal allowed.
NCLAT allowed appeal challenging dismissal of contempt petition for want of prosecution. Appellants sought permanent injunction restraining respondent from transferring 400 shares and mandatory injunction relief. Tribunal originally dismissed contempt petition due to non-compliance with registry objections and lack of prosecution. NCLAT held that contempt proceedings under Section 425 of Companies Act 2013 follow Contempt of Courts Act 1971 provisions. Court emphasized contempt proceedings maintain tribunal's prestige rather than enforce personal rights, thus should be decided on merits even without applicant's presence. Despite 374-day delay, NCLAT condoned delay citing appellants' medical ailments as reasonable cause. Tribunal erred in dismissing petition for want of prosecution when defects remained unrectified and proceedings had not properly commenced. Order dated 30.08.2019 rejecting contempt petition recalled and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
