Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld rejection of Section 9 application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for material concealment of facts and pre-existing disputes. Appellant failed to disclose that demand notice was based on MSEFC award dated 16.04.2018, concealed pending writ petition challenging said award before Kerala HC, and falsely averred that demand notice was not denied despite corporate debtor's reply denying liability citing pre-existing dispute. NCLAT applied clean hands doctrine, holding parties must approach judicial forums with complete disclosure of material facts bearing on adjudication. Since Section 9 proceedings were initiated through material concealment and evidence showed pre-existing disputes, tribunal's rejection was proper and required no interference. Appeal dismissed.
NCLAT upheld rejection of Section 9 application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for material concealment of facts and pre-existing disputes. Appellant failed to disclose that demand notice was based on MSEFC award dated 16.04.2018, concealed pending writ petition challenging said award before Kerala HC, and falsely averred that demand notice was not denied despite corporate debtor's reply denying liability citing pre-existing dispute. NCLAT applied clean hands doctrine, holding parties must approach judicial forums with complete disclosure of material facts bearing on adjudication. Since Section 9 proceedings were initiated through material concealment and evidence showed pre-existing disputes, tribunal's rejection was proper and required no interference. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
