Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed appeal challenging acquittal in dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appellant failed to establish respondent's vicarious liability as director when company entered liquidation on 29.07.2013 per HC order, while impugned cheque was issued on 28.10.2013. Prosecution witnesses admitted company's liquidation and official liquidator's control over assets. Court held appellant failed to prove respondent's specific role in cheque issuance post-liquidation or his responsibility for company's business conduct at time of offence. Presumption of innocence favoured accused throughout trial. HC affirmed trial court's acquittal finding ingredients under Section 138/141 NI Act unproven against respondent who ceased directorship upon liquidation.
HC dismissed appeal challenging acquittal in dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 read with Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Appellant failed to establish respondent's vicarious liability as director when company entered liquidation on 29.07.2013 per HC order, while impugned cheque was issued on 28.10.2013. Prosecution witnesses admitted company's liquidation and official liquidator's control over assets. Court held appellant failed to prove respondent's specific role in cheque issuance post-liquidation or his responsibility for company's business conduct at time of offence. Presumption of innocence favoured accused throughout trial. HC affirmed trial court's acquittal finding ingredients under Section 138/141 NI Act unproven against respondent who ceased directorship upon liquidation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
