Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Central Government rescinded Notification S.O. 966(E) dated 13 June 2007 which had originally designated 141.65 hectares at Thumkunta and Gollapuram Villages, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh as a Special Economic Zone for Apparel sector under the SEZ Act 2005. The developer had requested de-notification of the entire SEZ area. The Andhra Pradesh State Government provided a No Objection Certificate and confirmed the land would conform to state land use guidelines post de-notification. The Development Commissioner recommended approval for complete de-notification. The rescission was effected under the first proviso to Rule 8 of SEZ Rules 2006, with savings for acts done prior to rescission.
The Central Government rescinded Notification S.O. 966(E) dated 13 June 2007 which had originally designated 141.65 hectares at Thumkunta and Gollapuram Villages, Hindupur Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh as a Special Economic Zone for Apparel sector under the SEZ Act 2005. The developer had requested de-notification of the entire SEZ area. The Andhra Pradesh State Government provided a No Objection Certificate and confirmed the land would conform to state land use guidelines post de-notification. The Development Commissioner recommended approval for complete de-notification. The rescission was effected under the first proviso to Rule 8 of SEZ Rules 2006, with savings for acts done prior to rescission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
