Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed of a writ application challenging an ex-parte assessment order for violation of natural justice principles covering the period 01.10.2018 to 31.03.2019. Following precedent established in a coordinate bench decision, the court directed that upon payment of ten percent of the disputed tax amount, the petitioner would be entitled to stay of recovery until GST Tribunals are constituted and an appeal is filed within the prescribed timeframe. Both parties agreed that the substantive issues could be agitated before the Tribunal once established. The court noted that while pre-deposit requirements had been reduced to ten percent, this reduction was only effective from 01.11.2024, and GST Tribunals remained unconstituted with no possibility of filing appeals before that date. The application was disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of a writ application challenging an ex-parte assessment order for violation of natural justice principles covering the period 01.10.2018 to 31.03.2019. Following precedent established in a coordinate bench decision, the court directed that upon payment of ten percent of the disputed tax amount, the petitioner would be entitled to stay of recovery until GST Tribunals are constituted and an appeal is filed within the prescribed timeframe. Both parties agreed that the substantive issues could be agitated before the Tribunal once established. The court noted that while pre-deposit requirements had been reduced to ten percent, this reduction was only effective from 01.11.2024, and GST Tribunals remained unconstituted with no possibility of filing appeals before that date. The application was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
