Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC quashed orders passed under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, finding procedural irregularities constituting double jeopardy. The court identified that Form GST DRC 05 was incorrectly issued instead of the proper GST DRC 07 format for adjudication orders. The impugned order dated 27.08.2024 was passed without petitioner's participation in proceedings initiated via DRC 01 dated 20.12.2023, creating procedural overlap. The HC remitted the matter to the first respondent with directions to pass fresh orders on merit in accordance with law within 30 days of receiving the judgment copy. The petition was disposed of with the quashing of the contested orders.
The HC quashed orders passed under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017, finding procedural irregularities constituting double jeopardy. The court identified that Form GST DRC 05 was incorrectly issued instead of the proper GST DRC 07 format for adjudication orders. The impugned order dated 27.08.2024 was passed without petitioner's participation in proceedings initiated via DRC 01 dated 20.12.2023, creating procedural overlap. The HC remitted the matter to the first respondent with directions to pass fresh orders on merit in accordance with law within 30 days of receiving the judgment copy. The petition was disposed of with the quashing of the contested orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
