Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld disallowance of bogus long-term capital gains claimed by assessee on sale of penny stock shares. Investigation revealed assessee obtained accommodation entries through share broker who provided fictitious transactions. Tribunal found multiple discrepancies: assessee was not regular share investor, target company lacked sound financials justifying investment, astronomical gains occurred within short duration, family members engaged in similar bogus LTCG schemes, shares purchased off-market and dematerialized shortly before sale. Share certificate dated after shares appeared in assessee's account, indicating fictitious transactions. Applying Sumati Dayal precedent regarding preponderance of human probabilities, ITAT concluded assessee introduced unaccounted cash disguised as exempt LTCG. Addition sustained based on surrounding circumstances establishing bogus nature of transactions.
ITAT upheld disallowance of bogus long-term capital gains claimed by assessee on sale of penny stock shares. Investigation revealed assessee obtained accommodation entries through share broker who provided fictitious transactions. Tribunal found multiple discrepancies: assessee was not regular share investor, target company lacked sound financials justifying investment, astronomical gains occurred within short duration, family members engaged in similar bogus LTCG schemes, shares purchased off-market and dematerialized shortly before sale. Share certificate dated after shares appeared in assessee's account, indicating fictitious transactions. Applying Sumati Dayal precedent regarding preponderance of human probabilities, ITAT concluded assessee introduced unaccounted cash disguised as exempt LTCG. Addition sustained based on surrounding circumstances establishing bogus nature of transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
