Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding LTCG computation on sale of land and building where assessee held 1/4th share. AO computed capital gains using stamp duty valuation despite assessee's objections to stamp valuation authority's report. DVO valuation report determined property value at Rs.12,07,89,700, making assessee's share Rs.3,01,97,425. Since difference between DVO valuation and assessee's declared consideration was less than 5% of sale consideration, safe harbour provisions under third proviso of Section 50C applied for AY 2012-13. CIT(A) correctly considered DVO valuation report of co-owner and ruled in assessee's favour. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, recognizing proper application of safe harbour rule and rejecting AO's reliance on disputed stamp duty valuation.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal regarding LTCG computation on sale of land and building where assessee held 1/4th share. AO computed capital gains using stamp duty valuation despite assessee's objections to stamp valuation authority's report. DVO valuation report determined property value at Rs.12,07,89,700, making assessee's share Rs.3,01,97,425. Since difference between DVO valuation and assessee's declared consideration was less than 5% of sale consideration, safe harbour provisions under third proviso of Section 50C applied for AY 2012-13. CIT(A) correctly considered DVO valuation report of co-owner and ruled in assessee's favour. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, recognizing proper application of safe harbour rule and rejecting AO's reliance on disputed stamp duty valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
